“Without Freedom it is Impossible to Make Moral Choice” Discuss

Kant, a hushed predestinationist, said that in order to check a incorruptistic ratiocination we must have license. Kant believed that the ability to retain moral determinations lay within the existence of supererogatorydom stating that if we atomic number 18 non free to make our own closings those decisions could not be moral as we were never free to make that decision in the first place. Kant thought that a mortal could be goddam for an motivateion if they could have acted differently for example if a persons family is held at gunpoint and they be forced to open a safe they cannot be blamed as they did not have a choice.If we are to have free will we must have the ability to make a decision that is unhindered Kant believed that we must have free will if we are to be help morally responsible for our actions, if God did not give us free will then our decisions cannot be considered immoral or moral as we would have had to act in the air we did. Thus we cannot be held responsible a good moral action cannot be praised as you had no other option, whilst an immoral action cannot be punished as once again there was no free choice.John Locke who was also a soft predestinationist as he believed that righteousness and the ability to make moral decisions developed through with(predicate)out your lives. Locke believed that the attend was a tabula rosa, a blank slate that is shaped and filled by the persons life story experience and that ultimately creates a persons morality. However the sensory data that creates this moral fabric within the mind is already determined therefore using Lockes liking freedom is not required in order to make a moral decision it is the determined experiences you live through that create your morality and result in you making immoral or moral decisions.Another soft determinist was David Hume who believed in a limited form of free will, he ultimately believed that nature was in take hold of human destiny. That freedom wa s also subject-based, meaning that you are free to make a moral decision and free to follow through with that action. He went on to argue that determined events create human free will and that each individual is free to respond in their own way to those determined events the morality of the choice the person makes is down to them.Hume believed that nothing occurred by chance or luck but we do have the free will, even if limited, to make our own decisions A libertarian would state that humans decisions and actions are strictly uncaused that no choices we make are determined and that we are completely free to make our own choices, these can either be moral or immoral, thus we are completely responsible. Libertarianism is inapposite with determinism, this is because they believe determinism is incorrect as everyone is free to all act differently in the exact comparable event, not all of humans would act morally in such an event.Kant would have been against Libertarianism because desp ite existence a compatibilist Kant thought that some actions were determined. Others believe that it is not necessary to be required to accept obligation for your actions thus there is no need to be free in order to make moral decisions. Hard determinism also covers the problem of free will and moral decision making one of the most famous hard determinists is Clarence Darrow. Darrow was a defence lawyer who in the trial of Leob and Leopold used hard determinism to enkindle that we are not free thus we cannot make moral decisions.In the trial Darrow blamed their actions upon the way the deuce were brought up thus were predetermined to murder Robert Franks their upbringing determined how they would make moral decisions in the future. This pith that using Darrows idea Leob and Leopold did not have free will and thus could not make a moral choice their predestination meant that they would only make an immoral decision. Ted Honderich was another hard determinist who approached the id ea of free will using the physics as his base using the Aristotelian idea that nothing occurs without a cause.Honderich believed that events within the universe are determined and humans act in receipt to those events and are therefore not responsible for their actions. Using this belief one would argue that moral decisions cannot be made as there is no freedom to do so, everything is already determined beforehand. Saint Augustine was a religious determinist who believed that humanity required Gods help to do good this is apt(p) by God to humans, therefore God determines who will be saved and who will not. This is known as predestination there irrelevance of our actions whether moral or immoral as God has already elect those who shall be saved.John Calvin argued that people have no free will in regard to moral decision making stating that God makes his choice about who to save, therefore does not look at a person and recognise them as good. Calvin stated that people only do good b ecause God made them that way and placed them in an environment that would only make them do good. Logically Calvin concluded that if we have no control over our actions due to being made to act in a certain way, we cannot be considered responsible for them, thus we cannot make a moral decision as the decision and way we act was already determined by God.